Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Loosduinse Uitleg 61
Apartment at Loosduinse Uitleg 61 in 's-Gravenhage (Kom Loosduinen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1990 and has 74 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (5.2 km). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Keizer (65 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)14 Jul 2026
- Relisted22 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 74 m²
- Construction year
- 1990
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 295,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kom Loosduinen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.6%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.2 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.54 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share23.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,401 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)118 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical680 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.804 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away43.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
25th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.