Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Loosduinseweg 1063
Apartment at Loosduinseweg 1063 in 's-Gravenhage (Heesterbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1924 and has 81 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (2.6 km). The nearest primary school is Ds Dj Karressch Christelijke Basisonderwijs (434 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jun 2026€ 295,000−€ 4,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 299,000
Property details
- Living area
- 81 m²
- Construction year
- 1924
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 320,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Heesterbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot302 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.856 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away42.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47.1 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)7.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
37 permits within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
72nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 98 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 456 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 176 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.