Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Maartensdijklaan 2
Apartment at Maartensdijklaan 2 in 's-Gravenhage (Leyenburg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1939 and has 82 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (2.6 km). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Basisschool De Ark (32 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted12 Jun 2026€ 299,500−€ 25,500
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 82 m²
- Construction year
- 1939
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 345,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Leyenburg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.5%
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.41 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.6%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.87 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
46th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
81st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.