Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Muzenstraat 44
Apartment at Muzenstraat 44 in 's-Gravenhage (Uilebomen neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 105 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Centraal Station (307 m). The nearest primary school is Jan V Nassauschool voor Protestants Christelijk Basisonderwijs (766 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted9 Jul 2026€ 550,000−€ 19,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 569,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 515,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Uilebomen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to military terrain
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.2 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.5%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby16
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot976 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions13 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)66 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical210 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.839 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
36 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 705 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
52nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 429 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
22nd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
61st percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.