Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
New Yorksingel 33
Terraced house at New Yorksingel 33 in 's-Gravenhage (Hoge Veld neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 126 m² of living space, a 126 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (2.8 km). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool De Fontein (335 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)13 Jul 2026
- Under offer8 Jul 2026
- Relisted29 Jun 2026€ 585,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 595,000
Property details
- Living area
- 126 m²
- Plot
- 126 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 495,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoge Veld, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 kmⓘ
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)132,639 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away6 km
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated125 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place2.31 ratio
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot67 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average33%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions10 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space53 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)61 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical140 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 807 pupils
Disadvantage score 112 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 488 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 1% of schools
96th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 644 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
70th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 97 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 87 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.