Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Newtonstraat 291
Terraced house at Newtonstraat 291 in 's-Gravenhage (Koningsplein e.o. neighbourhood). The home was built in 1896 and has 66 m² of living space, a 65 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is De Klimop (206 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced27 Jun 2026€ 295,000−€ 24,500
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 319,500
Property details
- Living area
- 66 m²
- Plot
- 65 m²
- Construction year
- 1896
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 305,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Koningsplein e.o., compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)467 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.6 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.6%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery5%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area36
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated235 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space96 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,034 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,043 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.86 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away42.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
59 permits within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 98 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 458 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 125 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 696 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 19% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
9th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.