Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Okkernootstraat 86
Apartment at Okkernootstraat 86 in 's-Gravenhage (Rosenburg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1942 and has 78 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (3.7 km). The nearest primary school is BaO Aquamarijn (463 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 369,000−€ 6,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 78 m²
- Construction year
- 1942
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 305,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rosenburg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity26
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.9 km
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park9 m
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated200 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot683 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical580 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.845 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away43 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47.1 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.7 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 permits · 26 construction plans within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 176 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 456 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 420 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.