Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Raamstraat 51 B
Apartment at Raamstraat 51 in 's-Gravenhage (Zuidwal neighbourhood). The home was built in 1866 and has 133 m² of living space, 5 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (100 m). The nearest primary school is Zuidwalschool (320 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jun 2026€ 495,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 545,000
Property details
- Living area
- 133 m²
- Construction year
- 1866
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 570,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zuidwal, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions6,323 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to military terrain
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.5 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical520 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.902 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.7 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.2 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away2,814 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
104 permits within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
38th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
75th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
no recent test score · total 36 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
20th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 633 pupils
Disadvantage score 208 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
22nd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.