Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Roemeensestraat 12 A01
Apartment at Roemeensestraat 12 in Rotterdam (Oud Mathenesse neighbourhood). The home was built in 1937 and has 76 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Marconiplein (876 m). The nearest primary school is OBS Mathenesse (402 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026€ 265,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 76 m²
- Construction year
- 1937
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 239,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud Mathenesse, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.3%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High19.7%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated215 persons
- Liveability class
- Inadequateinsufficient
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.3555 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.217 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1469 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share18.8%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High17.2%
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime79.3 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)11%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)68.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)59.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure7
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby19
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside30.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32.3%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources10
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby6
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.74 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Voltage level of nearest line
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work47.6%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes61.8%
- Share of unemployment benefit
- Elevated1.6%· NL 1%
- Distance to nearest asylum reception centre
- Nearby (<1 km)465 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot475 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.351 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away24.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)27.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)8.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 121 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 291 pupils
Disadvantage score 90: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
28th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
no recent test score · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
17th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 102 pupils · total 864 pupils
Disadvantage score 156: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
14th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
17th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
19th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
65th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
65th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.