Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Schalk Burgerstraat 361
Apartment at Schalk Burgerstraat 361 in 's-Gravenhage (Transvaalkwartier-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1925 and has 67 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Chr Basisschool Comenius (111 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)14 Jul 2026
- Under offer6 Jul 2026
- Relisted28 Jun 2026€ 299,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 319,000
Property details
- Living area
- 67 m²
- Construction year
- 1925
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 199,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Transvaalkwartier-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Poor (label F/G)344 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorF
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.872 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away41 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)45.9 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)6.4 km
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Far from rail1.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 605 pupils
Disadvantage score 143 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 392 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.