Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Singravenstraat 39
Terraced house at Singravenstraat 39 in 's-Gravenhage (Parkbuurt oosteinde neighbourhood). The home was built in 1997 and has 150 m² of living space, a 158 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Gantel (443 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 615,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 625,000
Property details
- Living area
- 150 m²
- Plot
- 158 m²
- Construction year
- 1997
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 595,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Parkbuurt oosteinde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away6.5 km
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated125 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure9
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot80 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels48%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space69 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)131 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential5,027 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,037 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 350 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 807 pupils
Disadvantage score 112 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 488 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 1% of schools
96th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
70th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
58th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.