Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Sirtemastraat 251
Apartment at Sirtemastraat 251 in 's-Gravenhage (Kortenbos neighbourhood). The home was built in 1978 and has 100 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (864 m). The nearest primary school is Meester Schabergschool voor Christelijk Basisonderwijs (94 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 395,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale13 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1978
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 385,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kortenbos, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)435 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,267 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)175 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.866 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
26 permits within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 36 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
38th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
75th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 696 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 125 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.