Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Suzannaland 300
Apartment at Suzannaland 300 in 's-Gravenhage (Landen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1966 and has 100 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Mariahoeve (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Montessori Kindcentrum John F. Kennedy (304 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 365,000−€ 7,500
- For sale3 Jun 2026
- Off funda26 May 2026€ 372,500
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1966
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 360,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Landen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated150 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place3.12 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21.5%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High17.5%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)77.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,850 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical640 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.754 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away40.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)44.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
97th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 409 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 455 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 503 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 50 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 123 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.