Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Diemenstraat 169
Apartment at Van Diemenstraat 169 in 's-Gravenhage (Zeeheldenkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1918 and has 167 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Max Velthuijs (469 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jun 2026€ 1,160,000−€ 20,000
- For sale18 Jun 2026
- Under offer10 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,180,000
Property details
- Living area
- 167 m²
- Construction year
- 1918
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 870,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zeeheldenkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.6%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery4%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area38
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)155 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.84 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away42.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
43 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 36 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 458 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
38th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.