Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Wageningseberg 364
Apartment at Wageningseberg 364 in Utrecht (Lunetten-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 74 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Lunetten (1 km). The nearest primary school is Blauwe Aventurijn (334 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale22 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 74 m²
- Construction year
- 1992
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 445,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lunetten-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.146 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1155 score
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime82.7 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.3%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.74 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels9%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.9 km
- Distance to main/through road
- Right on main road61 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.1%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,360 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)166 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical710 m³
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.577 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
68th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
98th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
100th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
83rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3: more disadvantage than 21% of schools
66th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 29% of schools
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 3% of schools
17th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
92nd percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
14th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
73rd percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
92nd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.