Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | Weizichtstraat 21 Rotterdam | € 340.000 € 320.000 | -5.9% | 85 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Grote Visserijstraat 79 B Rotterdam | € 245.000 € 238.000 | -2.9% | 55 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Cannemanstraat 25 Rotterdam | € 399.000 € 385.000 | -3.5% | 106 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 6 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 92 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 4 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 92 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 2 A Rotterdam | € 555.000 € 535.000 | -3.6% | 87 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 2 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 92 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 6 A Rotterdam | € 565.000 € 540.000 | -4.4% | 87 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Texasweg 8 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 106 m²125 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Lisstraat 14 A01 Rotterdam | € 294.500 € 275.000 | -6.6% | 51 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Willem Buytewechstraat 115 C Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.500 | -4.1% | 66 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Goudsesingel 270 C Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 260.000 | -5.5% | 45 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Ruisvoornpad 51 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 574.500 € 549.500 | -4.3% | 158 m²154 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 23 A Schiedam | € 395.000 € 374.000 | -5.3% | 97 m²40 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Rietdekker 25 Poortugaal | € 819.000 € 799.000 | -2.4% | 163 m²308 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Jan Wilspad 28 Rotterdam | € 565.000 € 550.000 | -2.6% | 124 m²151 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Alphons Ariënsstraat 186 Schiedam | € 349.500 € 325.000 | -7.0% | 75 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Hollandiahof 32 Schiedam | € 575.000 € 539.000 | -6.3% | 128 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Lagendijk 319 Ridderkerk | € 750.000 € 695.000 | -7.3% | 126 m²805 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Weizichtstraat 21
Apartment at Weizichtstraat 21 in Rotterdam (Nieuwe Westen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1926 and has 91 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Marconiplein (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Van Oldenbarneveltschool (298 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced22 Jul 2026€ 320,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 340,000
Property details
- Living area
- 91 m²
- Construction year
- 1926
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 378,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuwe Westen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated305 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2234 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share20.6%
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place2.83 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)75.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)74.4%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure18
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport4.1 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby13
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside33.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors32.4%
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.88 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels2%
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Close to railway238 m
- Distance to nearest external safety facilityⓘ
- Nearby (within area of influence)1 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10 µg/m³
- Road traffic noiseⓘ
- Considerable noise16.6%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Voltage level of nearest lineⓘ
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot830 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)187 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.188 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away23.2 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)27.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
18 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
40th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 339 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
48th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 178 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.