Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31/07/2026 | Abrikozenstraat 92 Den Haag | € 399.000 € 389.000 | -2.5% | 88 m² | |||
31/07/2026 | Dirklangendwarsstraat 5 Delft | € 375.000 € 360.000 | -4.0% | 60 m²48 m² | |||
31/07/2026 | Hof van Delftlaan 7 Delft | € 920.000 € 880.000 | -4.3% | 157 m²140 m² | |||
31/07/2026 | Ursulaland 100 Den Haag | € 395.000 € 375.000 | -5.1% | 94 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Daniël Catterwijckstr 57 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 275.000 | -6.8% | 69 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Dr. Lelykade 196 E Den Haag | € 1.395.000 € 1.345.000 | -3.6% | 154 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Calliopestraat 50 Den Haag | € 585.000 € 559.000 | -4.4% | 112 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Alexander Gogelweg 91 Den Haag | € 725.000 € 700.000 | -3.5% | 145 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Wachtumstraat 42 Den Haag | € 515.000 € 500.000 | -2.9% | 95 m²129 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Dr. Lelykade 226 D Den Haag | € 895.000 € 850.000 | -5.0% | 165 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Karekietlaan 9 Leidschendam | € 1.450.000 € 1.400.000 | -3.5% | 266 m²339 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Burgemeester Elsenlaan 323 F109 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 485.000 € 470.000 | -3.1% | 97 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Herenstraat 44 B Monster | € 650.000 € 639.000 | -1.7% | 170 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Deltapromenade 398 Den Haag | € 1.195.000 € 1.100.000 | -8.0% | 165 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Badhuisstraat 21 Den Haag | € 795.000 € 750.000 | -5.7% | 165 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Ambachtshof 19 Wateringen | € 875.000 € 825.000 | -5.7% | 176 m²399 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Regentesselaan 9 1 Den Haag | € 520.000 € 497.000 | -4.4% | 116 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Bosschestraat 6 Den Haag | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 94 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Stavangerstraat 84 Den Haag | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 146 m²242 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Deltapromenade 383 Den Haag | € 1.550.000 € 1.495.000 | -3.5% | 179 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Abrikozenstraat 92
Apartment at Abrikozenstraat 92 in 's-Gravenhage (Eykenduinen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1933 and has 88 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (3.8 km). The nearest primary school is De Vlierboom (407 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 389,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale7 Jul 2026€ 399,000
Property details
- Living area
- 88 m²
- Construction year
- 1933
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 375,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Eykenduinen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated165 persons
- Number of building plans within 500 mⓘ
- Much building activity27
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away5.5 km
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- intensive building activity26 buildings
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure29
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity6
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.46 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels8%
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Below the national average49.1%
- Follow-up soil action requiredⓘ
- Further action neededYes
- Distance to nearest permitⓘ
- permit nearby57 m
- Paid parkingⓘ
- Paid parkingYes
- Central lottery for primary school in municipalityⓘ
- Municipality with central primary school ballotYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot279 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.845 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away43.2 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)47.4 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Well away (>2 km)2.6 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
28 permits · 27 construction plans within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
37th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 176 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
65th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 456 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 41: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 420 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
35th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
9th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
45th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
13th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
3rd percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
19th percentile: low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
31st percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
74th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.