Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dr. Lelykade 226 D
Apartment at Dr. Lelykade 226 in 's-Gravenhage (Vissershaven neighbourhood). The home was built in 2004 and has 162 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (3.7 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool De Oranjeschool (208 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jul 2026€ 850,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 895,000
Property details
- Living area
- 162 m²
- Construction year
- 2004
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 800,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vissershaven, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1154 score
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.6 km
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime87.8 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure37
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity13
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources6
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.79 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)699 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.3 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Large treatment plant244,800 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.7%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated6.9%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.6 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average55.8%
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot6,970 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.808 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away44.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)49.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)8.6 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood390 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
37 permits within 500 m · 10 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
28th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 80: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 71 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
77th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 100 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 238 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile: low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 52 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 22 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
99th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 142 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
24th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.