Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/07/2026 | Alexander Gogelweg 91 Den Haag | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 700.000 | -3.5% | 145 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Wachtumstraat 42 Den Haag | β¬ 515.000 β¬ 500.000 | -2.9% | 95 mΒ²129 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Dr. Lelykade 226 D Den Haag | β¬ 895.000 β¬ 850.000 | -5.0% | 165 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Karekietlaan 9 Leidschendam | β¬ 1.450.000 β¬ 1.400.000 | -3.5% | 266 mΒ²339 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Burgemeester Elsenlaan 323 F109 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 485.000 β¬ 470.000 | -3.1% | 97 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Herenstraat 44 B Monster | β¬ 650.000 β¬ 639.000 | -1.7% | 170 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Deltapromenade 398 Den Haag | β¬ 1.195.000 β¬ 1.100.000 | -8.0% | 165 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Badhuisstraat 21 Den Haag | β¬ 795.000 β¬ 750.000 | -5.7% | 165 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Ambachtshof 19 Wateringen | β¬ 875.000 β¬ 825.000 | -5.7% | 176 mΒ²399 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Regentesselaan 9 1 Den Haag | β¬ 520.000 β¬ 497.000 | -4.4% | 116 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Bosschestraat 6 Den Haag | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 350.000 | -6.7% | 94 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Stavangerstraat 84 Den Haag | β¬ 695.000 β¬ 675.000 | -2.9% | 146 mΒ²242 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Deltapromenade 383 Den Haag | β¬ 1.550.000 β¬ 1.495.000 | -3.5% | 179 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Leeghwaterkade 43 Den Haag | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 350.000 | -6.7% | 75 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Prinses Beatrixlaan 475 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 285.000 β¬ 269.500 | -5.4% | 60 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Frijdastraat 31 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 525.000 β¬ 500.000 | -4.8% | 123 mΒ²102 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Wilhelminastraat 53 Den Haag | β¬ 385.000 β¬ 350.000 | -9.1% | 85 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Willem Beukelszoonstraat 24 Den Haag | β¬ 585.000 β¬ 550.000 | -6.0% | 127 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Pieter van den Zandestraat 11 Den Haag | β¬ 425.000 β¬ 400.000 | -5.9% | 70 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Marcelisstraat 48 Den Haag | β¬ 675.000 β¬ 595.000 | -11.8% | 146 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Alexander Gogelweg 91
Apartment at Alexander Gogelweg 91 in 's-Gravenhage (Zorgvliet neighbourhood). The home was built in 1927 and has 145 mΒ² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Annie MG Schmidtschool (105 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jul 2026β¬ 700,000ββ¬ 25,000
- Price reduced15 Jul 2026β¬ 725,000ββ¬ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 750,000
Property details
- Living area
- 145 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1927
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- β¬ 765,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zorgvliet, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable0%
- Net labour participationβ
- Low55%
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsβ
- High crime118.1 per 1,000 residents
- Permits <500 m (12 months)β
- Much building pressure34
- Permits <500 m (3 months)β
- Very high construction activity14
- Distance to military terrainβ
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.4 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress46 Β°C
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Asbestos-suspected roof areaβ
- Large suspected asbestos roof area1,060.5 mΒ²
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)β
- Deep (0.5β2 m)0.71 m
- Flood risk classβ
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designationβ
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Few solar panels5%
- Within Wbb soil locationβ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Capacity nearest WWTPβ
- Large treatment plant244,800 i.e.
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Multiple industrial businesses4
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmβ
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectβ
- Noticeably warmer1.6 Β°C
- Distance to nearest asylum reception centreβ
- Nearby (<1 km)628 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)β
- Very generous plot6,935 mΒ²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOββ
- Very low0.84 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityβ
- Far away43.3 km
- Distance to biomass plantβ
- At distance (>3 km)48.6 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceβ
- ample distance1.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineβ
- Far away (>2 km)7.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
36 permits within 500 m Β· 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
99th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 53 pupils Β· total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 58 pupils Β· total 458 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 47 pupils Β· total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 31 pupils Β· total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 100 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 29 pupils Β· total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
99th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 7.0 Β· VWO Β· 114 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
77th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 87 exam candidates
93rd percentile: high Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.9 Β· VWO Β· 115 exam candidates
9th percentile: low Β· 87% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 116 exam candidates
20th percentile: low Β· 90% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 52 exam candidates
45th percentile: average Β· 96% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO Β· 22 exam candidates
28th percentile: average Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 103 exam candidates
34th percentile: average Β· 88% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 161 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.