Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Wachtumstraat 42
Terraced house at Wachtumstraat 42 in 's-Gravenhage (Morgenstond-West neighbourhood). The home was built in 2009 and has 94 m² of living space, a 129 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (2.8 km). The nearest primary school is Nutsbasisschool Morgenstond (261 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jul 2026€ 500,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale21 Jun 2026€ 515,000
Property details
- Living area
- 94 m²
- Plot
- 129 m²
- Construction year
- 2009
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 465,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Morgenstond-West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High18.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated175 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1269 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1287 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share27.1%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19.1%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.1 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.75 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)75.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure10
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.47 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable32%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels9%
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average49.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average45.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot66 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions12 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space54 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)67 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical550 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,527 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
81st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 67% of schools
46th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
41st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 84: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 330 pupils
Disadvantage score 78: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
25th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 111: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
35th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
9th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 101: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
78th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
49th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
3rd percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.