Price drops in and around Monster
More homes in and around Monster whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Herenstraat 44 B
Terraced house at Herenstraat 44 in Monster (Monster Centrumgebied neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 178 m² of living space, a 169 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Hoek van Holland Haven (5.8 km). The nearest primary school is WSKO De Zeester (243 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jul 2026€ 639,000−€ 11,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 178 m²
- Plot
- 169 m²
- Construction year
- 1992
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 637,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Monster Centrumgebied, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated110 persons
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away13 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away11.7 km
- Distance to train station
- Far away10.2 km
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)2,156,890 m²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby215.63 ha
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.04 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up78%
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology - 1
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 514,000
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)749 m
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Nearby (500 m – 1 km)652 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)93 m
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Nearby275 m
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance275 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away5.3 km
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space169 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential12,496 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,054 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.894 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away45.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 construction plan within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
84th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 284 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
25th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 345 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 52% of schools
81st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 387 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
40th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 142 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 442 pupils
Disadvantage score 3: more disadvantage than 21% of schools
61st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
25th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 108 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 18% of schools
69th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 626 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 204 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 140 exam candidates
63rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
90th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 99 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 273 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 27 exam candidates
60th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 140 exam candidates
41st percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 344 exam candidates
74th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.