Price drops in and around Roermond
More homes in and around Roermond whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Achter de Cattentoren 33
Apartment at Achter de Cattentoren 33 in Roermond (Binnenstad neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 99 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Roermond (665 m). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool Willem De Zwijgerschool (710 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)2 Jul 2026
- Under offer19 Jun 2026
- Relisted8 Jun 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 99 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 356,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Binnenstad, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)160 m
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot574 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions18 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)96 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.763 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 10 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
49th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 209 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 134 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
78th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 171 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
49th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
90th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
10th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 72 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
33rd percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 265 exam candidates
82nd percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 134 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 269 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
32nd percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.