Price drops in and around Leeuwarden
More homes in and around Leeuwarden whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 35 price cuts in and around Leeuwarden, averaging −5.4%. The biggest cut was € 76.000 (Haven 42, Goutum). Last updated 16 September.
All houses dropping in price in Leeuwarden →House prices and market figures in Leeuwarden →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-3.7%
For sale-10.5%
For sale-4.8%
For sale-7.0%
For sale-9.3%
For sale-5.1%
For sale-6.3%
For sale-4.0%
For sale-10.2%
For sale-3.2%
For sale-10.0%
For sale-2.5%
For sale-1.6%For sale-3.0%
For sale-3.3%
For sale-8.3%
For sale-2.1%
For sale-2.2%
For sale-7.3%
For sale-8.7%
For sale-9.2%
Under offer-5.4%
For sale-3.2%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Achter de Hoven 204
Terraced house at Achter de Hoven 204 in Leeuwarden (Achter de Hoven neighbourhood). The home was built in 1920 and has 95 m² of living space, a 130 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Leeuwarden (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is IKC De Kinderkoepel (608 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- For saletoday
- Price reducedtoday€ 197,500−€ 7,500
- Sold (conditional)13 Aug 2026
- Under offer3 Aug 2026
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 205,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 18.2% With children−13.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 61.5% Single-person+21.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 20.3% Other multi-person−8.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 48% Owner-occupied−9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 30% Social housing+2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22% Private rental+8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 74.5% Dutch background+2.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9.1% Rest of Europesame as the Netherlands
- 16.4% Outside Europe−2.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 26.6% Lowersame as the Netherlands
- 42.2% Intermediate+1.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 31.2% Higher−2.1 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Achter de Hoven neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
106 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 30.8% Theft / burglary−8.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 37.5% Other+4.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 7.7% Violence and threats−2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 24% Vandalism+14.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
55 permits within 500 m · 64 construction plans within 1 km · 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
56th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 452 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 54% of schools
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile: average · AMN · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 36% of schools
55th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 210 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 143 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
3rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
10th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 295 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
67th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
14th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VWO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
5th percentile: low · 76% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 86 exam candidates
82nd percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VWO · 32 exam candidates
67th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
42nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 82 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.