Price drops in and around Delft
More homes in and around Delft whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Adama van Scheltemaplein 38
Apartment at Adama van Scheltemaplein 38 in Delft (Aart van der Leeuwbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 92 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Delft Campus (910 m). The nearest primary school is IKC De Eglantier Voorhof (215 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer9 Jul 2026
- Price reduced23 Jun 2026€ 335,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 92 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 330,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Aart van der Leeuwbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away10.9 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated135 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1104 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.5%
- Net labour participation
- Low58%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,101 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.06 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away33 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)37.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)9.1 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood381 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
86th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 366 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 108 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
81st percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 26% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 198 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 359 pupils
Disadvantage score 165 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
12th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 90 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · PRO
23rd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 53 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 178 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 283 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.