Price drops in and around Benthuizen
More homes in and around Benthuizen whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Valeriusplein 228 Alphen aan den Rijn | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 100 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Filmlaan 1 Zoetermeer | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 115 m²129 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Breestraat 123 B Leiden | € 699.000 € 625.000 | -10.6% | 109 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schuitwater 17 Zoetermeer | € 475.000 € 469.000 | -1.3% | 132 m²153 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Poortwacht 144 Leiderdorp | € 565.000 € 550.000 | -2.6% | 137 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Beukehout 9 Zoetermeer | € 475.000 € 445.000 | -6.3% | 113 m²124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Dillenburgstraat 30 Alphen aan den Rijn | € 315.000 € 299.000 | -5.1% | 69 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | van Polanenpark 302D Wassenaar | € 65.000 € 60.000 | -7.7% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Perkstraat 67 Zevenhuizen (ZH) | € 519.000 € 489.000 | -5.8% | 116 m²124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Kramerplan 69 Zoetermeer | € 525.000 € 500.000 | -4.8% | 136 m²124 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Herlaerstraat 50 Bleiswijk | € 589.500 € 579.500 | -1.7% | 123 m²124 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Breestraat 54 D Leiden | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 38 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Waghenaerdreef 38 Bergschenhoek | € 650.000 € 645.000 | -0.8% | 138 m²170 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Seringenlaan 41 Wassenaar | € 1.185.000 € 1.100.000 | -7.2% | 215 m²155 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
14/07/2026 | Herenstraat 27 Leiden | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 81 m²57 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Hooftstraat 8 Bergschenhoek | € 569.500 € 550.000 | -3.4% | 130 m²120 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Wollefoppenweg 16 a Zevenhuizen (ZH) | € 1.250.000 € 1.095.000 | -12.4% | 165 m²535 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
de Gang 6
Terraced house at de Gang 6 in Benthuizen (Benthuizen Dorp-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1967 and has 109 m² of living space, a 125 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Willem Dreeslaan (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is School met de Bijbel (620 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced19 Jun 2026€ 495,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 530,000
Property details
- Living area
- 109 m²
- Plot
- 125 m²
- Construction year
- 1967
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 401,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Benthuizen Dorp-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable17%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Distance to indoor swimming poolⓘ
- Far away6.3 km
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away15.3 km
- GPs within 3 kmⓘ
- Few GPs nearby1
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place1.91 ratio
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)ⓘ
- Low (bottom quarter)7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot64 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average40%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space66 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)187 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,631 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,010 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 181 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 15% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 168 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 438 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
70th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 321 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 10% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 389 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 77 pupils · total 584 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
33rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 132 pupils · total 1041 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 8 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
44th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 356 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 76% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 250 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 378 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 53 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 267 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 121 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.