Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Den Hertigstraat 43 B
Home at Den Hertigstraat 43 in Rotterdam (Tarwewijk neighbourhood). The home has 44 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Zuidplein (705 m). The nearest primary school is Globe (395 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced13 Jun 2026€ 224,500−€ 4,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 229,000
Property details
- Living area
- 44 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 219,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Tarwewijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Very close (<500 m)302 m
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance10.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby6
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space60 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)159 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,906 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,018 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.008 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away19.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
26th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 351 pupils
Disadvantage score 91 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 81 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 404 pupils
Disadvantage score 116 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 301 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 344 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.