Price drops in and around Leiderdorp
More homes in and around Leiderdorp whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Zijde 118 Boskoop | € 485.000 € 465.000 | -4.1% | 104 m²151 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Duizendblad 44 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 598.000 € 569.500 | -4.8% | 128 m²169 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Golfbaan 47 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 459.500 € 439.500 | -4.3% | 69 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Valeriusplein 228 Alphen aan den Rijn | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 100 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 91 Warmond | € 2.690.000 € 2.295.000 | -14.7% | 300 m²965 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Breestraat 123 B Leiden | € 699.000 € 625.000 | -10.6% | 109 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Poortwacht 144 Leiderdorp | € 565.000 € 550.000 | -2.6% | 137 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | de Ruyterstraat 37 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 549.000 € 535.000 | -2.5% | 118 m²145 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Reinout 11 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 519.500 € 499.500 | -3.9% | 77 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Dillenburgstraat 30 Alphen aan den Rijn | € 315.000 € 299.000 | -5.1% | 69 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | van Polanenpark 302D Wassenaar | € 65.000 € 60.000 | -7.7% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Kramerplan 69 Zoetermeer | € 525.000 € 500.000 | -4.8% | 136 m²124 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Breestraat 54 D Leiden | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 38 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Snoeklaan 231 Voorhout | € 1.495.000 € 1.395.000 | -6.7% | 229 m²520 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Leidsemeerstraat 25 Buitenkaag | € 565.000 € 529.000 | -6.4% | 145 m²287 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Seringenlaan 41 Wassenaar | € 1.185.000 € 1.100.000 | -7.2% | 215 m²155 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
15/07/2026 | Hofvennepark 9 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 2.600.000 € 2.599.000 | -0.0% | 335 m²1649 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Boulevard 49 Katwijk (ZH) | € 1.400.000 € 1.350.000 | -3.6% | 170 m²183 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dijkwacht 140
Terraced house at Dijkwacht 140 in Leiderdorp (Leyhof neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 125 m² of living space, a 164 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Leiden Centraal (3.7 km). The nearest primary school is De Hobbit (832 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced2 Jul 2026€ 639,000−€ 11,000
- Listed for sale6 Jun 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 125 m²
- Plot
- 164 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 568,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Leyhof, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Distance to overhead high-voltage lineⓘ
- Very close36 m
- Within indicative high-voltage magnetic field zoneⓘ
- Within magnetic field zoneYes
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure8
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot95 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels44%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space59 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)160 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical740 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,237 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
48th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 493 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 191 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 200 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 315 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 202 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 451 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 117 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
11th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 45 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 122 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 125 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
50th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
86th percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 130 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
93rd percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 86 exam candidates
40th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 73 exam candidates
84th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 142 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.