Price drops in and around Kaatsheuvel
More homes in and around Kaatsheuvel whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Frederik Hendrikpark 58
Terraced house at Frederik Hendrikpark 58 in Kaatsheuvel (Staatsliedenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 109 m² of living space, a 124 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Tilburg Reeshof (9.7 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Den Bussel (362 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)15 Jul 2026
- Under offer10 Jul 2026
- Relisted25 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 109 m²
- Plot
- 124 m²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 297,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Staatsliedenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions4,608 kg/m2/yr
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Sharply elevated10.2 µg/kg
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,814.6 mol/ha/yr
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity36
- Distance to indoor swimming pool
- Far away7.1 km
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.3 km
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average26%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space55 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,795 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield989 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.769 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away26.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 36 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
41st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 277 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
91st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 9% of schools
52nd percentile — average · AMN · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 289 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 73 pupils · total 487 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 373 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 75 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
40th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 85 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
42nd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
92nd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 142 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 197 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.