Price drops in and around Zaandam
More homes in and around Zaandam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hanenpad 34
Semi-detached at Hanenpad 34 in Zaandam (Burgemeestersbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1901 and has 115 m² of living space, a 147 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Zaandam (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Herman Gorter (285 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced4 Jun 2026€ 525,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 545,000
Property details
- Living area
- 115 m²
- Plot
- 147 m²
- Construction year
- 1901
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 397,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Burgemeestersbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.5%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.9%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby38
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot66 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space100 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)147 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,979 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield994 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 601 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
no recent test score · total 112 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
31st percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 398 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
25th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 385 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
10th percentile — low · DOE · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 39% of schools
53rd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 143 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
62nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 71% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 218 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.