Price drops in and around Leiden
More homes in and around Leiden whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hoge Morsweg 121
Terraced house at Hoge Morsweg 121 in Leiden (Hoge Mors neighbourhood). The home was built in 1930 and has 104 m² of living space, a 92 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is De Vink (980 m). The nearest primary school is De Stevenshof (615 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted5 Jun 2026€ 485,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 104 m²
- Plot
- 92 m²
- Construction year
- 1930
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 551,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoge Mors, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park25 m
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.86 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space57 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical350 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,061 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.68 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
77th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 310 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 246 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
21st percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 101 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 412 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 302 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
58th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 372 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
84th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 142 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
70th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 304 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
40th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 73 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.