Price drops in and around Leiderdorp
More homes in and around Leiderdorp whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Zijde 118 Boskoop | € 485.000 € 465.000 | -4.1% | 104 m²151 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Duizendblad 44 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 598.000 € 569.500 | -4.8% | 128 m²169 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Golfbaan 47 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 459.500 € 439.500 | -4.3% | 69 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Valeriusplein 228 Alphen aan den Rijn | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 100 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 91 Warmond | € 2.690.000 € 2.295.000 | -14.7% | 300 m²965 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Breestraat 123 B Leiden | € 699.000 € 625.000 | -10.6% | 109 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Poortwacht 144 Leiderdorp | € 565.000 € 550.000 | -2.6% | 137 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | de Ruyterstraat 37 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 549.000 € 535.000 | -2.5% | 118 m²145 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Reinout 11 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 519.500 € 499.500 | -3.9% | 77 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Dillenburgstraat 30 Alphen aan den Rijn | € 315.000 € 299.000 | -5.1% | 69 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | van Polanenpark 302D Wassenaar | € 65.000 € 60.000 | -7.7% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Kramerplan 69 Zoetermeer | € 525.000 € 500.000 | -4.8% | 136 m²124 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Breestraat 54 D Leiden | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 38 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Snoeklaan 231 Voorhout | € 1.495.000 € 1.395.000 | -6.7% | 229 m²520 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Leidsemeerstraat 25 Buitenkaag | € 565.000 € 529.000 | -6.4% | 145 m²287 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Seringenlaan 41 Wassenaar | € 1.185.000 € 1.100.000 | -7.2% | 215 m²155 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
15/07/2026 | Hofvennepark 9 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 2.600.000 € 2.599.000 | -0.0% | 335 m²1649 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Boulevard 49 Katwijk (ZH) | € 1.400.000 € 1.350.000 | -3.6% | 170 m²183 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hoofdstraat 55
Terraced house at Hoofdstraat 55 in Leiderdorp (Kerkwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 173 m² of living space, a 183 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Leiden Lammenschans (2.2 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool Kastanjelaan (232 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 645,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 675,000
Property details
- Living area
- 173 m²
- Plot
- 183 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 691,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kerkwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby7
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0.2
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure19
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater23 m above sea level
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 507,000
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot95 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels44%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space96 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential6,901 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,027 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values12.7%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
19 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 194 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 373 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 265 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 813 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 451 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
78th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 82 pupils · total 653 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 202 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 200 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
50th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
86th percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 130 exam candidates
67th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 90 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 122 exam candidates
11th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 45 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 125 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
66th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.