Price drops in and around Delft
More homes in and around Delft whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jacoba van Beierenlaan 133
Apartment at Jacoba van Beierenlaan 133 in Delft (Krakeelpolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 1961 and has 71 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Delft (807 m). The nearest primary school is Delftse Montessorischool voor Basisonderwijs (59 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)14 Jul 2026
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 250,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 265,000
Property details
- Living area
- 71 m²
- Construction year
- 1961
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 283,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Krakeelpolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)375 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot746 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.036 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away33.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)38.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)8.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 198 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
92nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 473 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 399 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 600 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 359 pupils
Disadvantage score 165 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
86th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 366 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
23rd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 53 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 283 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 90 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 326 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 178 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.