Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/07/2026 | Klaprooslaan 93 Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 260.000 | -5.5% | 62 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | A.M. de Jongstraat 15 Ridderkerk | € 295.000 € 285.000 | -3.4% | 77 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Ellewoutsdijkstraat 214 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 122 m²109 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Ruilstraat 4 A Rotterdam | € 395.500 € 375.000 | -5.2% | 68 m²60 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 145 Schiedam | € 400.000 € 389.000 | -2.8% | 89 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Calandstraat 39 F Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 438.000 | -2.7% | 48 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Roemeensestraat 12 A01 Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 265.000 | -3.6% | 76 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Dordtsestraatweg 741 D Rotterdam | € 349.000 € 329.000 | -5.7% | 109 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Gustav Vasaborg 60 Schiedam | € 625.000 € 595.000 | -4.8% | 158 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Prins Alexanderlaan 10 Vlaardingen | € 1.675.000 € 1.495.000 | -10.8% | 291 m²950 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | 1e Middellandstraat 59 A Rotterdam | € 495.000 € 450.000 | -9.1% | 110 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Wilhelminakade 323 Rotterdam | € 1.200.000 € 1.175.000 | -2.1% | 147 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Wilhelmina Hofman-Pootstraat 56 Spijkenisse | € 650.000 € 600.000 | -7.7% | 170 m²324 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | van Hogendorplaan 332 Vlaardingen | € 289.500 € 275.000 | -5.0% | 67 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Boerhaavelaan 51 B Schiedam | € 185.000 € 150.000 | -18.9% | 56 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Rietkraag 4 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 850.000 € 819.000 | -3.6% | 173 m²373 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Drevenpark 105 Vlaardingen | € 675.000 € 650.000 | -3.7% | 143 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 132 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 460.000 € 450.000 | -2.2% | 147 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Mathenesserweg 41 A Rotterdam | € 269.000 € 264.000 | -1.9% | 63 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Bergselaan 134 B Rotterdam | € 695.000 € 650.000 | -6.5% | 134 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Klaprooslaan 93
Apartment at Klaprooslaan 93 in Rotterdam (Schiebroek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1962 and has 62 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Meijersplein / Airport (240 m). The nearest primary school is IKC Wonderwijs (257 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jul 2026€ 260,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 62 m²
- Construction year
- 1962
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 256,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schiebroek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share18.9%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High17%
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place8.52 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)81.8%
- Distance to glasshouse horticulture areaⓘ
- Greenhouses very nearby356 m
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport1.8 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside43.4%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors42.7%
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Many transmission masts nearby8
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater26 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)ⓘ
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.06 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)947 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)5 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1.5 km
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticultureⓘ
- Nearby356 m
- Distance to nearest greenhouseⓘ
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance357 m
- Distance to main/through roadⓘ
- Right on main road100 m
- Distance to airport (incl. small)ⓘ
- Aerodrome nearby — slight aircraft noise possible1.6 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance7.9%
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High flight nuisance17.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot332 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.018 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away24.6 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)30.9 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
84th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
95th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 92 pupils · total 678 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 46: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
12th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 95: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
73rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 330 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 436 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
66th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 67 exam candidates
33rd percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
4th percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 71 exam candidates
77th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 67 exam candidates
81st percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
78th percentile: high · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 184 exam candidates
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.