Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/07/2026 | Ruilstraat 4 A Rotterdam | € 395.500 € 375.000 | -5.2% | 68 m²60 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 145 Schiedam | € 400.000 € 389.000 | -2.8% | 89 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Calandstraat 39 F Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 438.000 | -2.7% | 48 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Roemeensestraat 12 A01 Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 265.000 | -3.6% | 76 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Dordtsestraatweg 741 D Rotterdam | € 349.000 € 329.000 | -5.7% | 109 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Gustav Vasaborg 60 Schiedam | € 625.000 € 595.000 | -4.8% | 158 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Prins Alexanderlaan 10 Vlaardingen | € 1.675.000 € 1.495.000 | -10.8% | 291 m²950 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | 1e Middellandstraat 59 A Rotterdam | € 495.000 € 450.000 | -9.1% | 110 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Wilhelminakade 323 Rotterdam | € 1.200.000 € 1.175.000 | -2.1% | 147 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Wilhelmina Hofman-Pootstraat 56 Spijkenisse | € 650.000 € 600.000 | -7.7% | 170 m²324 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | van Hogendorplaan 332 Vlaardingen | € 289.500 € 275.000 | -5.0% | 67 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Boerhaavelaan 51 B Schiedam | € 185.000 € 150.000 | -18.9% | 56 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Rietkraag 4 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 850.000 € 819.000 | -3.6% | 173 m²373 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Drevenpark 105 Vlaardingen | € 675.000 € 650.000 | -3.7% | 143 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 132 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 460.000 € 450.000 | -2.2% | 147 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Mathenesserweg 41 A Rotterdam | € 269.000 € 264.000 | -1.9% | 63 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Bergselaan 134 B Rotterdam | € 695.000 € 650.000 | -6.5% | 134 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Paradijslaan 132 B03 Rotterdam | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 95 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Burgemeester Gijsenlaan 36 Schiedam | € 225.000 € 210.000 | -6.7% | 45 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerstraat 63 A Rotterdam | € 395.000 € 365.000 | -7.6% | 93 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ruilstraat 4 A
Terraced house at Ruilstraat 4 in Rotterdam (Nieuwe Westen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1909 and has 68 m² of living space, a 60 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Delfshaven (486 m). The nearest primary school is CBS Mozaiek (125 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jul 2026€ 375,000−€ 20,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 395,500
Property details
- Living area
- 68 m²
- Plot
- 60 m²
- Construction year
- 1909
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 282,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuwe Westen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Poor (label F/G)350 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorF
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated185 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2234 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share20.6%
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place2.98 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)75.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)74.4%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure28
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity7
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport4.9 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby22
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby12
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside33.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors32.4%
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.45 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels2%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Elevated emissions64 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)66 m
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.5 µg/m³
- Road traffic noiseⓘ
- Considerable noise16.6%
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy63 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing55 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Share of social assistance recipientsⓘ
- Elevated6.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space41 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential3,303 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.26 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away22.5 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)26.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
26 permits within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
40th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
11th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
27th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
54th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
97th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
65th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
48th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.