Price drops in and around Maassluis
More homes in and around Maassluis whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Mgr. W.M. Bekkerslaan 14
Apartment at Mgr. W.M. Bekkerslaan 14 in Maassluis (Sluispolder West neighbourhood). The home was built in 1968 and has 83 mΒ² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Maassluis Centrum (693 m). The nearest primary school is IKC De Kindertuin (150 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jul 2026β¬ 335,000ββ¬ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 83 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1968
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- β¬ 300,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Sluispolder West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1212 score
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High18.6%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity37
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away15.9 km
- Distance to train station
- Far away10.3 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away11.2 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.8%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure17
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity6
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby39
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources7
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater23 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5β2 m)1.24 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)646 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby12.9 km
- Noise load
- Heavy61 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated2%
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Many greenhouses (possible light nuisance)15,440 mΒ²
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,212 mΒ²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average36%
- Calculated COβ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical630 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOβ
- Very low1.431 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away34.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)34 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
15 permits Β· 37 construction plans within 500 m Β· 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
39th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 52 pupils Β· total 499 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
76th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 326 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
6th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 58 pupils Β· total 484 pupils
Disadvantage score 100: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
49th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 16 pupils Β· total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
91st percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 13 pupils Β· total 134 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 37% of schools
81st percentile: high Β· DOE Β· grade 8: 32 pupils Β· total 256 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 33% of schools
40th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 316 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 25 pupils Β· total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
60th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 27 pupils Β· total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
8th percentile: low Β· 82% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 148 exam candidates
41st percentile: average Β· 96% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 71 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results Β· VBO
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO
85th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 31 exam candidates
88th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.7 Β· VBO Β· 138 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
60th percentile: average Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 201 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.