Price drops in and around Oss
More homes in and around Oss whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Raadhuislaan 61
Apartment at Raadhuislaan 61 in Oss (Centrum-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1979 and has 103 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Oss (798 m). The nearest primary school is Hertogin Johanna locatie V (254 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced13 Jun 2026€ 399,000−€ 11,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 410,000
Property details
- Living area
- 103 m²
- Construction year
- 1979
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 393,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Centrum-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.7%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby39
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby14
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away20.8 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,679 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)190 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical580 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values12.3%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.627 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away40.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)19 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
98th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 416 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
24th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
48th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 283 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 160 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 51% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
71st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
10th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 472 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 291 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
59th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 229 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 98 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 86 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 177 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 122 exam candidates
42nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 101 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.