Price drops in and around Oss
More homes in and around Oss whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18/07/2026 | Hoflaan 14 Maasbommel | € 545.000 € 535.000 | -1.8% | 113 m²510 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Krabbenhoek 9 Heesch | € 619.000 € 599.500 | -3.1% | 156 m²247 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Hamaritilaan 1 Ophemert | € 550.000 € 539.000 | -2.0% | 137 m²375 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Middendam 12 Alphen (GE) | € 839.000 € 795.000 | -5.2% | 212 m²1176 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Burgemeester van den Elzenlaan 26 Oss | € 575.000 € 535.000 | -7.0% | 159 m²259 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Heuvelwijkstraat 12 Lith | € 675.000 € 600.000 | -11.1% | 200 m²1639 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Sluiskeshoeven 21 Rosmalen | € 735.000 € 695.000 | -5.4% | 203 m²303 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Mouterij 13 Berlicum | € 599.000 € 585.000 | -2.3% | 163 m²281 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Vijversingel 54 Oss | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 157 m²239 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Runselstraat 10 Berghem | € 1.695.000 € 1.550.000 | -8.6% | 362 m²8520 m² | |||
07/07/2026 | De Groeskant 50 Berlicum | € 725.000 € 700.000 | -3.5% | 166 m²354 m² | |||
04/07/2026 | Hannie Schaftplantsoen 31 Oss | € 519.000 € 495.000 | -4.6% | 162 m²173 m² | |||
03/07/2026 | Spil 14 Schaijk | € 849.000 € 819.000 | -3.5% | 170 m²370 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | De Vlasakkers 10 Oss | € 399.000 € 389.000 | -2.5% | 107 m²148 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Rooijsestraat 59 Dreumel | € 395.000 € 375.000 | -5.1% | 83 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Veluwe 11 Heerewaarden | € 839.000 € 789.000 | -6.0% | 246 m²5400 m² | |||
01/07/2026 | Oegstgeestsestraat 16 Berlicum | € 449.000 € 425.000 | -5.3% | 95 m²232 m² | |||
30/06/2026 | Colijnstraat 3 Oss | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 116 m²158 m² | |||
30/06/2026 | Sint Jorisstraat 30 Berlicum | € 489.000 € 475.000 | -2.9% | 119 m²190 m² | |||
29/06/2026 | Lorskensstraat 1 Schaijk | € 650.000 € 598.000 | -8.0% | 152 m²448 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Raadhuislaan 93
Apartment at Raadhuislaan 93 in Oss (Centrum-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1979 and has 90 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Oss (826 m). The nearest primary school is Hertogin Johanna locatie V (257 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced4 Jun 2026€ 419,500−€ 15,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 435,000
Property details
- Living area
- 90 m²
- Construction year
- 1979
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 373,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Centrum-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.7%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby40
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby14
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside36.2%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors44%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,679 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)172 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical580 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values12.3%
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.627 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away40.3 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)19 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
98th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 416 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
24th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
48th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 283 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 160 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 51% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
71st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 472 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
10th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 291 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
59th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 229 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 98 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 86 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 177 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 122 exam candidates
42nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 101 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.