Price drops in and around Naaldwijk
More homes in and around Naaldwijk whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Sint Martinusstraat 301
Apartment at Sint Martinusstraat 301 in Naaldwijk (Naaldwijk Centrumgebied neighbourhood). The home was built in 2006 and has 105 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Hoek van Holland Haven (6.1 km). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Basisschool de Ouverture (342 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 570,000−€ 10,000
- Price reduced1 Jul 2026€ 580,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 595,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 2006
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 478,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Naaldwijk Centrumgebied, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)670,881 m²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby67.11 ha
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away13 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away11.1 km
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,356 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions19 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)104 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.007 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 26 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
41st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 376 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 51% of schools
no recent test score · total 127 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 37% of schools
85th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 353 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 423 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
24th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
76th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 256 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
89th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 291 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
42nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 171 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 99 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
61st percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 273 exam candidates
41st percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 344 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 27 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 140 exam candidates
63rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 204 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 140 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.