Price drops in and around Leiden
More homes in and around Leiden whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Bonnikeplein 105 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 510.000 € 489.000 | -4.1% | 77 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Stoeplaan 11 F24 Wassenaar | € 875.000 € 840.000 | -4.0% | 150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Duizendblad 44 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 598.000 € 569.500 | -4.8% | 128 m²169 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Golfbaan 47 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 459.500 € 439.500 | -4.3% | 69 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Filmlaan 1 Zoetermeer | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 115 m²129 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 91 Warmond | € 2.690.000 € 2.295.000 | -14.7% | 300 m²965 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Breestraat 123 B Leiden | € 699.000 € 625.000 | -10.6% | 109 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Poortwacht 144 Leiderdorp | € 565.000 € 550.000 | -2.6% | 137 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | de Ruyterstraat 37 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 549.000 € 535.000 | -2.5% | 118 m²145 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Reinout 11 Noordwijk (ZH) | € 519.500 € 499.500 | -3.9% | 77 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | van Polanenpark 302D Wassenaar | € 65.000 € 60.000 | -7.7% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Kramerplan 69 Zoetermeer | € 525.000 € 500.000 | -4.8% | 136 m²124 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Breestraat 54 D Leiden | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 38 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Snoeklaan 231 Voorhout | € 1.495.000 € 1.395.000 | -6.7% | 229 m²520 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Leidsemeerstraat 25 Buitenkaag | € 565.000 € 529.000 | -6.4% | 145 m²287 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Seringenlaan 41 Wassenaar | € 1.185.000 € 1.100.000 | -7.2% | 215 m²155 m² | 0 0 1 |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Tesselschadestraat 16
Terraced house at Tesselschadestraat 16 in Leiden (Lage Mors neighbourhood). The home was built in 1934 and has 171 m² of living space, a 135 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Leiden Centraal (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Morskring (167 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced13 Jun 2026€ 879,000−€ 21,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 900,000
Property details
- Living area
- 171 m²
- Plot
- 135 m²
- Construction year
- 1934
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 797,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lage Mors, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorF
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside43.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot53 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space117 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical500 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential8,428 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.2%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 412 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 302 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 101 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
79th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 586 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 238 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 310 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 416 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
84th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 142 exam candidates
70th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 304 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
40th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 73 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
87th percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 125 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.