Price drops in and around Berkel en Rodenrijs
More homes in and around Berkel en Rodenrijs whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Vosmaerstraat 14
Detached at Vosmaerstraat 14 in Berkel en Rodenrijs (Vlinderstrik neighbourhood). The home was built in 1959 and has 173 mΒ² of living space, a 489 mΒ² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Rodenrijs (152 m). The nearest primary school is Prins Willem Alexanderschool (729 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026β¬ 739,500ββ¬ 35,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 775,000
Property details
- Living area
- 173 mΒ²
- Plot
- 489 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1959
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- β¬ 680,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vlinderstrik, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable10%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity39
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.7 km
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park48 m
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Very close (<50 m)50 m
- Distance to glasshouse horticulture area
- Greenhouses very nearby373 m
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport2.5 km
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 Β°C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)88,423 mΒ²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater26 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Calculated COβ emissions
- Elevated emissions77 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)327 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average⬠566,000
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)595 m
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Nearby373 m
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance373 m
- Distance to airport (incl. small)
- Aerodrome nearby β slight aircraft noise possible2.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- High flight nuisance15%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses3
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land23%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot375 mΒ²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels55%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space139 mΒ²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential9,734 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield998 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values12.1%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits Β· 39 construction plans within 500 m Β· 12 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
81st percentile: high Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 246 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
42nd percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 35 pupils Β· total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 37 pupils Β· total 387 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 62 pupils Β· total 674 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 92 pupils Β· total 678 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 34 pupils Β· total 330 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 16 pupils Β· total 155 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 16 pupils Β· total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
6th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
50th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 46: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
90th percentile: high Β· 100% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO Β· 184 exam candidates
71st percentile: average Β· 94% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 178 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
72nd percentile: average Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 207 exam candidates
87th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.7 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 98 exam candidates
4th percentile: low Β· 75% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 71 exam candidates
66th percentile: average Β· 96% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 67 exam candidates
75th percentile: average Β· 98% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 92 exam candidates
no exam results Β· HAVO/VWO
78th percentile: high Β· 94% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 158 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.