Price drops in and around Bergen (NH)
More homes in and around Bergen (NH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zijl 85
Terraced house at Zijl 85 in Bergen (NH) (Saenegheest neighbourhood). The home was built in 1973 and has 128 m² of living space, a 188 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Alkmaar (3.4 km). The nearest primary school is OBS Saenewijs (472 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 525,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 565,000
Property details
- Living area
- 128 m²
- Plot
- 188 m²
- Construction year
- 1973
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 448,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Saenegheest, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Well above national average€ 646,000
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.7 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- GPs within 3 km
- Few GPs nearby1
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Very close (<50 m)32 m
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to nearest induced earthquake
- Earthquake very nearby1.6 km
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.62 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Severest induced earthquake in the neighbourhood
- Possibly light damage3.5 ML
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered1
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work34.7%· NL 27%
- Distance to interchange station
- Quite far4.7 km
- Daily shops within 1 km
- Few convenience shops0.8
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Some pressure in places1.04 ratio
- Child-friendliness (score)
- Fair49 score
- % owner-occupied homes in 100 m section
- Predominantly rental (below NL average ~55%)30%
- Liveability index: amenities
- Slightly fewer facilities than average-0.0377 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- elevated share14.4%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot100 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels44%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space78 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,656 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,041 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values5.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.384 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
42nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 127 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 19% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 177 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 288 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
89th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 163 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 251 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
58th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 193 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 62 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
51st percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 149 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 139 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 251 exam candidates
55th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 123 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.