Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Albert van Raalteplein 61
Apartment at Albert van Raalteplein 61 in Schiedam (Van Zantenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1967 and has 158 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Nieuwland (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is El Furkan Basisschool (217 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jun 2026€ 525,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale16 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 158 m²
- Construction year
- 1967
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 454,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 30-06-2064)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Van Zantenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.7%
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- Severe flight nuisance20.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,090 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)160 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.378 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away28.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 407 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
30th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 370 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 271 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
65th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 135 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
no recent test score · total 366 pupils
75th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 308 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 355 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
46th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
28th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
43rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 62 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 243 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.