Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Anatole Franceplaats 424
Apartment at Anatole Franceplaats 424 in Rotterdam (Ommoord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1971 and has 151 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Hesseplaats (379 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Fridtjof Nansen Jenaplan Basisschool (188 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced9 Jul 2026€ 495,000−€ 55,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 151 m²
- Construction year
- 1971
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 391,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ommoord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away8.9 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated165 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place12.33 ratio
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1434 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,708 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)102 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.822 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 10 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
64th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 20% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
70th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
41st percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
no exam results · PRO
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.