Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Antilopestraat 32
Terraced house at Antilopestraat 32 in Rotterdam (Kralingseveer neighbourhood). The home was built in 1938 and has 81 m² of living space, a 96 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is 's-Gravenweg (902 m). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Basisschool de Fontein (617 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced16 Jul 2026€ 385,000−€ 7,000
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 392,000−€ 7,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 399,000
Property details
- Living area
- 81 m²
- Plot
- 96 m²
- Construction year
- 1938
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 313,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kralingseveer, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant324,000 i.e.
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.9 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.3
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space88 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,166 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,001 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.924 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away16.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 6% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 629 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 614 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 294 pupils
Disadvantage score 100 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 508 pupils
Disadvantage score 177 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 80 pupils
87th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 79 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 37 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 434 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
14th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 42 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.