Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Arent van 's-Gravesandestraat 29
Terraced house at Arent van 's-Gravesandestraat 29 in Rotterdam (Het Lage Land neighbourhood). The home was built in 1978 and has 164 m² of living space, a 214 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Oosterflank (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool voor Christelijk Onderwijs Onze Wereld (284 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced15 Jul 2026€ 620,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 635,000
Property details
- Living area
- 164 m²
- Plot
- 214 m²
- Construction year
- 1978
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 535,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Het Lage Land, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)455 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot115 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space76 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)162 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,347 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 22 construction plans within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 88 pupils · total 685 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
63rd percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
no exam results · MAVO
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.