Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Brielselaan 40 A
Home at Brielselaan 40 in Rotterdam (Tarwewijk neighbourhood). The home has 131 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Maashaven (158 m). The nearest primary school is Het Kompas (234 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced13 Jul 2026€ 425,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 131 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 441,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Tarwewijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside28.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors30.7%
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,782 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions14 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space3,838 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)66 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.009 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.8 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)3.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 404 pupils
Disadvantage score 116 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VWO
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.