Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Deensestraat 53 C
Home at Deensestraat 53 in Rotterdam (Oud Mathenesse neighbourhood). The home has 104 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Centrum (884 m). The nearest primary school is OBS Mathenesse (438 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jul 2026€ 305,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 320,000
Property details
- Living area
- 104 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 278,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud Mathenesse, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby18
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space77 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,425 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.351 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away24.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)27.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)8.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 121 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
28th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
no recent test score · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 291 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 237 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 102 pupils · total 864 pupils
Disadvantage score 156 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
34th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.