Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Einsteinplaats 909
Apartment at Einsteinplaats 909 in Rotterdam (Ommoord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1969 and has 75 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Binnenhof (138 m). The nearest primary school is Prins Alexander (207 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced12 Jun 2026€ 305,000−€ 7,500
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 312,500
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 1969
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 286,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ommoord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away8.9 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place11 ratio
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1434 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot10,525 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.927 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)30.4 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 12 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
64th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 20% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 69 pupils · total 628 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
70th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
78th percentile — high · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.