Price drops in and around Ridderkerk
More homes in and around Ridderkerk whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Erasmuspark 105
Apartment at Erasmuspark 105 in Ridderkerk (Het Zand neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 100 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Barendrecht (4.8 km). The nearest primary school is De Botter (385 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 515,000−€ 24,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 539,000
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 428,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Het Zand, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away12 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.6 ratio
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)13%
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot152 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.8 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,805 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels47%
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical630 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.705 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away10 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 272 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 51% of schools
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 380 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 274 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 536 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 240 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 58 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 99 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 244 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.