Price drops in and around Ridderkerk
More homes in and around Ridderkerk whose asking price was recently cut.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
-4.0%
-3.2%
-1.8%
-9.8%
-6.5%
-3.0%
-4.3%
-7.7%
-3.9%
-2.6%
-3.7%
-6.7%
-4.5%
-4.6%
-4.5%
-1.6%
-5.1%
-4.3%
-6.7%
-2.6%
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Erasmuspark 105
Apartment at Erasmuspark 105 in Ridderkerk (Het Zand neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 103 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Barendrecht (4.8 km). The nearest primary school is De Botter (385 m).
Know first, then bid.
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 515,000−€ 24,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 539,000
Property details
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Features
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 5 construction plans within 1 km · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
51st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 272 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
26th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 51% of schools
84th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 380 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
55th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 274 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 46% of schools
15th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 536 pupils
Disadvantage score 95: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 240 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
95th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 58 exam candidates
74th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 99 exam candidates
15th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 244 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.