Price drops in and around Capelle aan den IJssel
More homes in and around Capelle aan den IJssel whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Floris Burgwal 84
Apartment at Floris Burgwal 84 in Capelle aan den IJssel (Burgenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 149 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Capelle Schollevaar (585 m). The nearest primary school is De Contrabas (302 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted2 Jul 2026€ 449,000−€ 1,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 149 m²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 466,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Burgenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away10 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.6%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)3.16 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,354 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average27%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)178 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 78 pupils · total 771 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 110 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
63rd percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 148 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
no exam results · PRO
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.